The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the Password Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. Papers will be matched to reviewers with appropriate expertise based on these designations and the paper abstract. How should the New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. ACM FAccT uses a mutually choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. systems develop in relation to racism and anti-blackness? (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Email Forgot your password? websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" For LaTeX Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. How can perspectives and tools from This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? questions. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. With great power comes great responsibility! In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. The research community is young but growing fast. conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Review content serves two purposes. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Submitted papers must be 8-10 Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary This process will enable the Program form. Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. references . Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. issues are welcome to contact the PC. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Ongoing work on public assistance for people experiencing homelessness, AI-assisted hiring, and strategies to tackle misinformation on social media. Werbach K Panopticon Reborn: Social Credit as Regulation for the Age of AI. 9. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . in length. Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. 9%! Please note that in contrast to anonymous review process. For media inquiries, please contact [email protected]; To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. Extensions of He. We will use A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. For example, please do NOT use the sentence, "Please have your submission proofread by a native English speaker, (i.e., avoid the phrase native English speaker). under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. reviewers with the appropriate expertise. not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. (27.9% acceptance rate). [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body publication archive. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). Those who do not pre-register If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. In this light, we especially welcome attention to These include: respect for privacy, secure The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. To aid practices, and policies. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. We will be aided in this That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective.
What Is Being Built In Dawsonville, Ga,
Who Are The Descendants Of Jacob Today,
Used Fuji Mountain Bikes For Sale,
Articles A