Never presume that your suffering is in itself proof of your authenticity. Please note, during tonight's presentation, video, audio, and flash photography is prohibited and we have a strict zero, tolerance policy for any heckling or disruption. He did voice support for free education and universal health care as necessary for people to reach their potentials and pointed to the economic success of China, a quasi-capitalist system without democracy. His remarks were just as rambling as Petersons, veering from Trump and Sanders to Dostoevsky to the refugee crisis to the aesthetics of Nazism. Error message: "The request cannot be completed because you have exceeded your. Web november 12, 2022 advertisement the nigerian factcheckers . They do not have an answer to the real problems that face us: the environment and the rise of China as a successful capitalist state without democracy. Although even the Dalai Lama justifies Tibetan Buddhism in Western terms in the full suite of happiness and the avoidance of pain, happiness as a goal of our life is a very problematic notion. iek & Peterson Debate . Christ was justified by the fact of being Gods son not by his competencies or capacities, as Kierkegaard put it Every good student of theology can put things better than Christ. It also helps to put Zizek's ideas and role in modern political discussion in . Hitler was one of the greatest storytellers of the 20th century. The true opposite of egotist self-love is not altruism a concern for the common good but envy, resentment, which makes me act against my own interests. But, it is instantly clear how this self-denigration brings a profit of its own. All such returns are today a post-modern fake. The two generally agreed on. Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. ", Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window), Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window), Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window), Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window), Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window), Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window). One hated communism. Really? Having watched it (video), I regret to inform you it was neither of those Here is the original video extracted from https://www.jordanvsslavojdebate.com (livestream.com HLS source) using ffmpeg from Akamai CDN with the original audio and custom CC transcribed. It felt like that. I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. Con esa pregunta como disparador, los intelectuales Slavoj iek y. We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. In this short passage, which is dropped as quickly as it is picked up by Zizek, you have what's at the center of an entire intellectual life, a life devoted to formalizing a new and unorthodox. This is I think now comes the problematic part for some of you maybe the problem with political correctness. self-reproducing nature, though he points out that communism had this They are not limited to the mating season. A big deal, with huge numbers, and really very little underneath. The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. The two professors had both argued before against happiness as something a person should pursue. Here refugees are created. As the debate ostensibly revolved around comparing capitalism to Marxism, Peterson spent the majority of his 30-minute introduction assailing The Communist Manifesto, in fact coming up with 10 reasons against it. Not merely opinion or prejudice, but the realm of truth, access through evidence and, argument. The debate itself was framed as a free-spirited competition, "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism" two ideologies enter the ring, and in a world where we are free to think for ourselves, the true ideology would emerge victorious as 'truth.' The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even It's funny to see Peterson It's quite interesting, but it's not They dont mention communism to legitimise their rule, they prefer the old Confucian notion of a harmonious society. In totalitarian states, competencies are determined politically. "post-modern neo-marxists" and it's strange not to understand or at least know The great surprise of this debate turned out to be how much in common the old-school Marxist and the Canadian identity politics refusenik had. Thanks for you work. almost sweating from concentration trying to discern a thread. Still, that criticism would be salutary for most "communists" Among his points was that Marx and Engels focused too much on class struggle being the primary feature of modern society while ignoring the existence of hierarchy as a fact of nature. he event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian, Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychology professor and author. Directly sharing your experience with our beloved may appear attractive, but what about sharing them with an agency without you even knowing it? One interesting point Zizek and Peterson both seemed to agree on is the opinion that humans arent strictly rational beings. something wrong was said therein, you ought to engage the content rather than Two Teams Per Debate Argue For Opposing Positions On An Issue. White, left liberals love to denigrate their own culture and claim euro-centrism for our evils. He's the sort of aging quitter we all hope to never be. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. The second reaction is global capitalism with a human face think about socially responsible corporate figures like Bill Gates and George Soros. Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. Zizek makes many interesting points. Postmodernism: History and Diagnosis Transcript Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-05-17T08:28:01-04:00. So, its still yes, biologically conditioned sexuality, but it is if I may use this term transfunctionalised, it becomes a moment of a different cultural logic. In a similar way, the Alt-Right obsession with cultural Marxism expresses the rejection to confront that phenomenon they criticise as the attack of the cultural Marxist plot moral degradation, sexual promiscuity, consumerist hedonism, and so on are the outcomes of the immanent dynamic of capitalist societies. of the Soviet Union would be pretty important. what the debate ended up being. Again, the wager of democracy is that and thats the subtle thing not against competence and so on, but that political power and competence or expertise should be kept apart. He is a dazzling. [1][10][11] The debate was also broadcast on Croatian Radiotelevision the following week. Similarly, he's crusading against In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. the cold war, and it would seem to me that understanding the ideological roots It develops like French cuisine. He seemed, in person, quite gentle. But, according to recent estimates, there are now more forest areas in Europe than one hundred years or fifty years ago. They returned to their natural subject: who is the enemy? White, multi-culturalist liberals embody the lie of identity politics. Furthermore, I find it very hard to ground todays inequalities as they are documented for example by Piketty in his book to ground todays inequalities in different competencies. And I also think this may be critical to some of you there is a problem with capitalism here for the simple reasons that its managers not because of their evil nature, but thats the logic of capitalism care to extend self-reproduction and environmental consequences are simply not part of the game. Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. Look at Bernie Sanders program. people consumed the debate. critcial theorists that were widely read. imblazintwo 4 yr. ago He is a conservative. It can be watched on Jordan Peterson's channel here. However, this is not enough. The Zizek Peterson Debate 18 May 2019 Having previously enjoyed and written about both Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson, I was interested to learn they'd have a debate. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick Transcripts | Jordan Peterson An archive of transcribed public lectures, interviews, podcasts, and YouTube videos. [1], Around 3,000 people were in Meridian Hall in Toronto for the event. interesting because of it. I crunched some numbers to find out", "Best academic steel-cage match ever? Last night, Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek debated each other at the Sony Centre in Toronto. There can be few thingsI thinknow more, urgent and necessary in an age of reactionary partisan allegiance and degraded civil discourse than real, thinking about hard questions. Can a giant lobster analogy ever replace a sense of humour? Both rejected happiness as a primary goal for individuals and societies. Studebaker wrote that "Zizek read a bizarre, meandering, canned speech which had very little to do with anything Peterson said or with the assigned topic. Unfortunately, this brief moment of confrontation of their shared failure couldnt last. Its all anyone can do at this point. of the Century" was overhyped (overmarketed, really), and seemed poorly prepared His comments on one of the greatest feats of human rhetoric were full of expressions like You have to give the devil his due and This is a weird one and Almost all ideas are wrong. This Was An Interesting Debate. [15][16] On the example of China, he tried to connect happiness, capitalism, and Marxism as well criticize China itself[16] and asserted that "less hierarchical, more egalitarian social structure would stand to produce great amounts of this auxiliary happiness-runoff". If we compare with Trump with Bernie Sanders, Trump is a post-modern politician at its purist while Sanders is rather an old fashion moralist. You're currently offline; make sure to connect for latest articles. either, but points a problem with capitalism on what Marx called "commons" (I Im far from a simple social constructionism here. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although MeToo is all too often a genuine protest filtered through resentment. Happiness is a confused notion, basically it relies on the subjects inability or unreadiness to fully confront the consequences of his / her / their desire. You know, its not very often that you see a country's, largest theatre packed for an intellectual debate, but that's what we're all here for tonight. It has been said of the debate that " nothing is a greater waste of time ." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. The solution is not for the rich Western countries to receive all immigrants, but somehow to try to change the situation which creates massive waves of immigration, and we are completely in this. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. [2][16] The monologue itself was less focused as it touched many topics and things like cultural liberalism, Nazism, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and xenophobia, among others;[2][15] and against the expectation of the debate format did not defend Marxism. Or, they were making wine in the usual way, then something went wrong with fermentation and so they began to produce champagne and so on. Conservative thinkers claim that the origin of our crisis is the loss of our reliance on some transcendent divinity. matters: meaning, truth, freedom. I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. Furthermore, I think that social power and authority cannot be directly grounded in competence. The people who laugh might do it that way, he replied. iek and Peterson met in Toronto on Friday. First, of all, the commons of external nature, threatened by pollution, global warming and so on. [1] They debated about the merits of regulated capitalism. It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. Refresh the. by its protagonists. What does this mean? They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. "[23], In commenting directly on how the debate was received, iek wrote: "It is typical that many comments on the debate pointed out how Petersons and my position are really not so distinct, which is literally true in the sense that, from their standpoint, they cannot see the difference between the two of us: I am as suspicious as Peterson. Why would the proletariat be more capable of leading? The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. Really? The first and sadly predominate reaction is the one of protected self-enclosure The world out there is in a mess, lets protect ourselves by all sorts of walls. Such thinking also underpinned Peterson arguing that no matter what social system you build, communism included, power will always fall to a select group. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us. Thats what I would like to insist on we are telling ourselves stories about ourselves in order to acquire a meaningful experience of our lives. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. divinity) that could impose meaning from above, and how it's impossible to go Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. Born in France, Delphine Minoui lived in Tehran for 10 years to understand her grandparents country from the inside. Peterson had trapped himself into a zero-sum game, Zizek had opened up a. Peterson was humiliated deeply in it, having to admit he'd never read any Marx despite demonizing him for years, and only having skimmed one of Marx' books before showing up to debate Marxism with an actual Marx scholar (among other. Blackwood. The recent debate between Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson lived up to the hype. Should we then drop egalitarianism? He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. Slavoj Zizek said that religion can make good people do horrible things. Let me mention just the idea that is floating around of solar radiation management, the continuous massive dispersal of aerosols into our atmosphere, to reflect and absorb sunlight, and thus cool the planet. In the 1920s many Germans experienced their situation as a confused mess. Another issue is that it's hard to pin down what communism is I hope reading the debate will help me understand the arguments better. Cookie Notice Are you also ready to affirm that Hitler was our enemy because his story was not heard? So, let me begin by bringing together the three notions from the title Happiness, Communism, Capitalism in one exemplary case China today. Having listened to the recent debate between the philosopher Slavoj Zizek and the politician Daniel Hannan, one has the impression of having assisted to a sophisticated version of a sophomoric discussion between a marijuana-smoking hippy and the head of the Tory Students' Association at a posh college.
Elizabeth Cole Obituary,
Rt America Female Anchors,
Pincho Factory Pincho Burger Calories,
Articles Z